Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSIvsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Lightest1,626 kg3,585 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score79/100
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range577 km358 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,626kg3,585lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | - |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.0s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 62.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 539km335mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,000cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,873mm192in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,687mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,692mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 570L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 5,700-7,000 rpm | 2,250-5,700 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 390 hp 291 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 4.2 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 539 km 335 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.2 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20263.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 539 km 335 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Is 269 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 3.0 V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























