Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score77/100
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,551 kg3,419 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,626kg3,585lb | 1,551kg3,419lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.0s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 53.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 17.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 539km335mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,386mm173in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,549mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 485L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 5,700-7,000 rpm | 2,250-5,700 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI has 90 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,551 kg 3,419 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 4.2 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 539 km 335 mi |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.2 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 2024VZ5 2.5 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,626 kg 3,585 lb | 1,551 kg 3,419 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 539 km 335 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























