Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 3.0 P400
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
3.0 P400
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range921 km572 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,608 kg3,545 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,608kg3,545lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 43.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.3s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 921km572mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,465L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 5,700-7,000 rpm | 2,250-5,700 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.3 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 120 mph | 171 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400 has 10 hp more than Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 4.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 5.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400 has more power, Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 591 km 367 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 921 km 572 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P400 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 921 km 572 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Is 402 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P400
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 330 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Has 338 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























