Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0vsCupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range850 km528 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178hp133kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,521kg3,353lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,528mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 4,750-5,500 rpm | 1,350-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 12 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 7.4 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 850 km 528 mi |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 178 hp 133 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0 | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp 133 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0 | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper S 2.0
- Is 41 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 163 km (101 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























