Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsHongqi HS7 II 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi HS7 II
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,481 kg3,265 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score86/100
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,481kg3,265lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 105.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 633km393mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,995mm197in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,960mm77in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,760mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,920mm115in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has 7 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 8.5 s |
Although Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T has more power, Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 8.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS7 II2.0T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | HongqiHS7 II2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 633 km 393 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI | Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Is 504 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























