Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,481 kg3,265 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,481kg3,265lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 68.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 633km393mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,451mm175in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,528mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,505L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 245 hp 183 kW |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW |
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp has 41 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 6.8 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 6.7 s |
Although Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp has more power, Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 633 km 393 mi |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI245 hp | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI204 hp | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 633 km 393 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI 245 hp
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI 204 hp
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























