Volkswagen T-Roc II
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSIvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,399 kg3,084 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,399kg3,084lb | 1,466kg3,232lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.7s Calculated | 65.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,372mm172in | 4,451mm175in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,629mm104in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.7 s | 65.5 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 1,399 kg 3,084 lb |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 8.9 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 877 km 545 mi |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,399 kg 3,084 lb | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc II 1.5 eTSI
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























