Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024

1.5 eTSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
Power
204hp152kW
150hp112kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
83.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
64.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
820km509mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,451mm175in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,679mm105in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,583mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,555mm61in
Trunk volume
540L
450L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSICupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
64.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
150 hp
112 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 54 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 54 hp (40 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI9.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI: 1.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
820 km
509 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
150 hp
112 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
9.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
820 km
509 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSICupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 54 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI

  • Is 258 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Cupra Formentor 1.5 eTSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
S 2.0
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
1.5 eTSI
1.4 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
1.5 eTSI
GLB 200d
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
1.5 eTSI
1.3 DIG-T
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 eTSIvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 1.5 eTSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster