Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsCupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,481 kg3,265 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,551kg3,419lb | 1,481kg3,265lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 633km393mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,613mm64in | 1,528mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,549mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 110 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 55 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,551 kg 3,419 lb |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 633 km 393 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,551 kg 3,419 lb | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 633 km 393 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Is 70 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























