Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsChevrolet Seeker 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Chevrolet Seeker

1.5T

184 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDCVTTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T

  • Lightest
    1,410 kg
    3,109 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.7 mpg US
    42.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    760 km
    472 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSIChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,521kg3,353lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
-
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
70.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
34.1s
Calculated
55.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.7mpg US42.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km427mi
Calculated
760km472mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,537mm179in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,823mm72in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,572mm62in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,573mm62in
Trunk volume
420L
414L
Max trunk volume-
1,405L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIChevrolet Seeker 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
ChevroletSeeker1.5T5,500 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSIChevroletSeeker1.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.1 s
55.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
184 hp
137 kW

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
220 km/h
137 mph
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI7.1 s
ChevroletSeeker1.5T7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
688 km
427 mi
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
760 km
472 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
184 hp
137 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,537 mm
178.6 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSIChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,537 mm
178.6 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Range score
688 km
427 mi
760 km
472 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSIChevrolet Seeker 1.5T
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.7 mpg US42.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km11.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi18.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal987 L261 US gal217 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,727 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T

  • Is 111 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1.5T
650T
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
1.3 T270
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1.5T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 TSI
GLA 220d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
GLA 220d
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster