Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 25tvsChevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Malibu (XL) · Facelift 2019
Redline 550T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)25t | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,629kg3,591lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | - |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,933mm194in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,589mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 166g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)25t | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t has 9 hp more than Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T and Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 6.7 s |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25t and Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T and Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 241 hp 180 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)25t | ChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 166 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 25t | Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Malibu (XL) Facelift 2019 Redline 550T
- Is 104 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























