Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5)
Car comparison
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16VvsWiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful355 hp265 kW
- Highest torque474 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 355hp265kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 474Nm350lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 49.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,564mm180in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,215mm48in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,654mm104in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 393L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 355 hp 265 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW |
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V has 34 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 5.3 s |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
Although Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V has more power, Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V and Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | 355 hp 265 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | 321 hp 239 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V | WiesmannRoadster3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 355 hp 265 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 393 L 13.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C5) 5.7 i V8 16V
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 124 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























