Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8vsRolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Dawn
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,769 kg3,900 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.3 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions285 g/km
- Best economy score73/100
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque820 Nm605 lb-ft
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 453hp338kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 820Nm605lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,769kg3,900lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 576km358mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,344mm53in | 1,502mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 206L | 321L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | 330g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has 118 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 118 hp (88 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 4.8 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5.0 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 453 hp 338 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 576 km 358 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | 330 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8 | Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Convertible 6.2 V8
- Is 791 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Has 118 hp more
- Has 203 Nm more
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























