Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
S 2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk334 L
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score87/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,558kg3,435lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 610km379mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,640cc222cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 334L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 335 hp 250 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 has 15 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 610 km 379 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 335 hp 250 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.4 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 610 km 379 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 76 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























