Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range730 km453 mi
- Largest trunk334 L
- Best economy score87/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful335 hp250 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,558kg3,435lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 96.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 18.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 610km379mi Calculated | 730km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,640cc222cu in | 1,988cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,286mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,532mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 334L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 335 hp 250 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 has 35 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 610 km 379 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 730 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 335 hp 250 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,558 kg 3,435 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 610 km 379 mi | 730 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Is 223 kg lighter
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 76 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























