Car comparison

TVR Griffith 5.0vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

TVR Griffith

5.0

326 hp4997 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1990-2002
VS

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

TVR Griffith 5.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    269 km/h
    167 mph
  • Most powerful
    326 hp
    243 kW
  • Lightest
    1,060 kg
    2,337 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    308 hp/t
    229 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Highest torque
    472 Nm
    348 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelTVRGriffith5.0ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
326hp243kW
310hp231kW
Torque
434Nm320lb-ft
472Nm348lb-ft
Curb weight
1,060kg2,337lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,300kg2,866lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
51.4s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
21.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
308hp/t229kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
409Nm/t274lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
538km334mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,997cc305cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
3,965mm156in
4,914mm193in
Width
1,943mm76in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,282mm90in
2,568mm101in
Front track
1,460mm57in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,460mm57in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume-
215L
Max trunk volume-
930L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
57L
64L
CO2 emissions-
278g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

TVR Griffith 5.0Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • TVR Griffith 5.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
TVRGriffith5.05,500 rpm4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricTVRGriffith5.0ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
21.2 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.0
326 hp
243 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW

TVR Griffith 5.0 has 16 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and TVR Griffith 5.0: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.0
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
472 Nm
348 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.0
1,060 kg
2,337 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.0
269 km/h
167 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
254 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.04.4 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Griffith 5.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRGriffith5.0
308 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
TVRGriffith5.0
326 hp
243 kW
4.4 s
269 km/h
167 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
5.5 s
254 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
TVRGriffith5.0
Power
326 hp
243 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,965 mm
156.1 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleTVRGriffith5.0ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
326 hp
243 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
5.5 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,060 kg
2,337 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,965 mm
156.1 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
-
538 km
334 mi
CO2 score
-
278 g/km
Trunk score
-
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
308 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

TVR Griffith 5.0

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Is 545 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 114 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
TVR Griffith 5.0
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.0
3.2
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
5.0
3.5 V8
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsFerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
5.0
5.3
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsAston MartinVirage Volante5.3
Z28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
5.0
4.6 i V8 32V
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsCadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
5.0
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
CLK 500
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
5.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
5.0
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
TVRGriffith5.0vsFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
TVR Griffith 5.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster