Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
VS

Ford Mustang V Convertible

4.6 i V8 24V

304 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2005-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Fastest top speed
    254 km/h
    158 mph
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    472 Nm
    348 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,605 kg
    3,538 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
310hp231kW
304hp227kW
Torque
472Nm348lb-ft
434Nm320lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
1,930kg4,255lb
-
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
21.2s
Calculated
22.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.7s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
538km334mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,665cc346cu in
4,601cc281cu in
Length
4,914mm193in
4,765mm188in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,877mm74in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,568mm101in
2,720mm107in
Front track
1,542mm61in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,540mm61in
1,600mm63in
Trunk volume
215L
275L
Max trunk volume
930L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
64L
61L
CO2 emissions
278g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24VPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
  • Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V5,750 rpm4,500 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.2 s
22.2 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.7 s
13.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 6 hp more than Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
434 Nm
320 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
254 km/h
158 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
5.5 s
254 km/h
158 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
304 hp
227 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
304 hp
227 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
310 hp
231 kW
304 hp
227 kW
Torque
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
5.3 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
538 km
334 mi
-
CO2 score
278 g/km
-
Trunk score
215 L
7.6 cu ft
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 38 Nm more
  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 vs Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster