Mercedes-Benz CL (C140)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8vsChevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lightest1,644 kg3,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption19.8 L/100 km11.9 mpg US14.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score66/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 441Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,644kg3,624lb |
| Gross weight | 2,600kg5,732lb | 1,922kg4,237lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 115.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,973cc303cu in | 5,737cc350cu in |
| Length | 5,065mm199in | 4,907mm193in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,945mm116in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 has 35 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 7.3 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,043 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 29 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Is 436 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























