Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5vsChevrolet Blazer 650T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Blazer
650T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,017 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ChevroletBlazer650T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 101.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.7s Calculated | 46.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,203km748mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,953mm77in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,732mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,863mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,687mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 1,017L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 2,103L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,280 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ChevroletBlazer650T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.7 s | 46.6 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Chevrolet Blazer 650T has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 7.1 s |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 9.0 s |
Although Chevrolet Blazer 650T has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 1.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| ChevroletBlazer650T | 237 hp 177 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletBlazer650T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ChevroletBlazer650T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,203 km 748 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 1,017 L 35.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 512 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























