Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5vsChevrolet Blazer 650T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021
VS

Chevrolet Blazer

650T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Chevrolet Blazer 650T

  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Lightest
    1,835 kg
    4,045 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,017 L
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5ChevroletBlazer650T
Power
235hp175kW
237hp177kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
101.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
36.7s
Calculated
46.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city-
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,203km748mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,953mm77in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,732mm68in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,863mm113in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,687mm66in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
-
Trunk volume
505L
1,017L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
2,103L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
73L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5Chevrolet Blazer 650TPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B54,000 rpm1,740-2,280 rpm5,000 rpm
ChevroletBlazer650T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5ChevroletBlazer650T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.7 s
46.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
ChevroletBlazer650T
237 hp
177 kW

Chevrolet Blazer 650T has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
ChevroletBlazer650T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
ChevroletBlazer650T
1,835 kg
4,045 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
220 km/h
137 mph
ChevroletBlazer650T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B57.1 s
ChevroletBlazer650T9.0 s

Although Chevrolet Blazer 650T has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 1.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
ChevroletBlazer650T
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
ChevroletBlazer650T
237 hp
177 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
ChevroletBlazer650T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,732 mm
68.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5ChevroletBlazer650T
Power
235 hp
175 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
9.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,732 mm
68.2 in
Range score
1,203 km
748 mi
-
CO2 score
155 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Chevrolet Blazer 650T

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 512 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 vs Chevrolet Blazer 650T - car comparison - FastVsFaster