Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

ChangAn UNI-Z

1.5T

192 hp1494 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

  • Lightest
    1,500 kg
    3,307 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.0 mpg US
    39.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    771 km
    479 mi
  • Largest trunk
    638 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
204hp152kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,500kg3,307lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
1,895kg4,178lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
76.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
47.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33mpg US39.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
771km479mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,494cc91cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,730mm186in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,795mm110in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,603mm63in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,603mm63in
Trunk volume
540L
638L
Max trunk volume-
1,425L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIChangAn UNI-Z 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
47.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
192 hp
143 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 12 hp more than ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
1,500 kg
3,307 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
771 km
479 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
192 hp
143 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
4,730 mm
186.2 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
4,730 mm
186.2 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
771 km
479 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33 mpg US39.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi20.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,070 L283 US gal235 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,872 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 98 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1.5T
GLB 220
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
1.6T
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
S 2.0
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
1.5T
40 TDI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1.5T
GLA 220
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 TSI
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster