Changan Nevo E07
89.98 kWh
598 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2024-present
Car comparison
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 580 125 kWh
544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2023-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful598 hp446 kW
- Lightest2,398 kg5,287 lb
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 598hp446kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 645Nm476lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,398kg5,287lb | 2,770kg6,107lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,410kg7,518lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 36.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,045mm199in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,695mm67in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 3,120mm123in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,690mm67in | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 524L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 598 hp 446 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh has 54 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh and Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 645 Nm 476 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 598 hp 446 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 598 hp 446 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 645 Nm 476 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 372 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
- Has 213 Nm more
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsAUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 20244.0 TFSI V8
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMaseratiGrecaleFolgore 105 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023AMG GLS 63 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 600 V8
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Folgore 105 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 680 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsPolestar3111 kWh
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 45 S