AUDI SQ6 e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWhvsChangan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChangan Nevo E07
89.98 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful598 hp446 kW
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,350 kg5,181 lb
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 598hp446kW |
| Torque | - | 645Nm476lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,398kg5,287lb |
| Gross weight | 2,965kg6,537lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 36.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,771mm188in | 5,045mm199in |
| Width | 1,965mm77in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 514L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,517L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.6 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 598 hp 446 kW |
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh has 81 hp more than AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh and Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh: 81 hp (60 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 4.4 s |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh and AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 598 hp 446 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 598 hp 446 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 645 Nm 476 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb | 2,398 kg 5,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 514 L 18.2 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Has 81 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























