Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 250vsCadillac GT4 28T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac GT4
28T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | CadillacGT428T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,633mm182in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,535mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 131mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 289L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250: Power / Torque
- Cadillac GT4 28T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacGT428T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | CadillacGT428T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Cadillac GT4 28T has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250 and Cadillac GT4 28T: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacGT428T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| CadillacGT428T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| CadillacGT428T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 6.8 s |
| CadillacGT428T | 7.8 s |
Although Cadillac GT4 28T has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250 and Cadillac GT4 28T: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 630 km 391 mi |
| CadillacGT428T | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacGT428T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacGT428T |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250 | CadillacGT428T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250 | Cadillac GT4 28T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 250
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 136 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Has 13 hp more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 184 km (114 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























