Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220vsCadillac GT4 25T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac GT4
25T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 63.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,633mm182in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,536mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 131mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 289L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: Power / Torque
- Cadillac GT4 25T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacGT425T | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 63.0 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW |
Cadillac GT4 25T has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 and Cadillac GT4 25T: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| CadillacGT425T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| CadillacGT425T | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 7.6 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 8.8 s |
Although Cadillac GT4 25T has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 and Cadillac GT4 25T: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 630 km 391 mi |
| CadillacGT425T | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | CadillacGT425T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 | Cadillac GT4 25T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 136 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Has 21 hp more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























