Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsMaserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range899 km559 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 386Nm285lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 57.7s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 899km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,971mm196in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,945mm77in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 2,998mm118in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,653mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 388L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 207g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 16.7 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 has 10 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6.7 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 766 km 476 mi |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 899 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.7 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 5.5 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 899 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 207 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 114 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Has 112 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























