Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsCadillac STS 4.6 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac STS
4.6 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score82/100
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 386Nm285lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 468km291mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,985mm196in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 2,957mm116in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 388L | 464L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 336g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 has 15 hp more than Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6.7 s |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 and Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 766 km 476 mi |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 468 km 291 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.7 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW | 6.7 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 468 km 291 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 336 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 | Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 298 km (185 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Has 34 Nm more
- Has 76 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























