Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsCadillac STS 4.6 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac STS
4.6 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions245 g/km
- Best estimated range569 km353 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 468km291mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,985mm196in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,957mm116in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 464L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | 336g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 has 70 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 6.9 s |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 569 km 353 mi |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 468 km 291 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW | 6.7 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 468 km 291 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | 336 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 | Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 91 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























