Opel Insignia Sedan (A) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) · Facelift 2013 2.0vsCadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS III
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,538 kg3,391 lb
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,538kg3,391lb | 1,651kg3,640lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 972km604mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,842mm191in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,737mm108in | 2,910mm115in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 388L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,015L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 5,300-5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Cadillac CTS III 2.0 has 22 hp more than Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 7.5 s |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 972 km 604 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0
- Is 113 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 112 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























