Cadillac ATS Sedan
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0vsCadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS III
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful276 hp206 kW
- Lightest1,484 kg3,272 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk388 L
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 276hp206kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,484kg3,272lb | 1,651kg3,640lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 727km452mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,644mm183in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,427mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,910mm115in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 381L | 388L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 has 4 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 6.0 s |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | CadillacCTS III2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 276 hp 206 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 727 km 452 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Has 47 Nm more
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























