Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) · Facelift 2006
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) · Facelift 2006 E 500 V8vsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque536 Nm395 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 388hp289kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Gross weight | 2,310kg5,093lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,461cc333cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,854mm112in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,800-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 388 hp 289 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 has 17 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8 and Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 5.3 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | 388 hp 289 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006E 500 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 388 hp 289 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W211) Facelift 2006 E 500 V8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 168 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 6 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























