Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8vsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque536 Nm395 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,412mm56in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,507mm59in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 has 38 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 and Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5.2 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 93 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























