HSV Clubsport (VE)
Car comparison
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8vsCadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS I
V 6.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Most powerful418 hp312 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 418hp312kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 536Nm395lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.4s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 5,967cc364cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,864mm191in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 362L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 189 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 has 13 hp more than Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
Although HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 has more power, Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW | 4.9 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 418 hp 312 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 14 Nm more
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























