Cadillac CTS I
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8vsCadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS III
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque536 Nm395 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk388 L
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 536Nm395lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.2s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.1s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 735km457mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,864mm191in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 2,910mm115in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 388L |
| Max trunk volume | 362L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.1 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 118 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 has 133 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8: 133 hp (99 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 4.6 s |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 735 km 457 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 362 L 12.8 cu ft | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS I V 6.0 i V8
- Has 133 hp more
- Has 136 Nm more
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























