Volkswagen Golf V Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSIvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,362 kg3,003 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,362kg3,003lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.8s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,390cc85cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,556mm179in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,504mm59in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,495L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.8 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 8.5 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.6 s |
Although Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has more power, Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Is 198 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 149 km (93 mi) more estimated range
- Has 86 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























