Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Renault Laguna III Grandtour

2.0 dCi FAP

178 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    985 km
    612 mi
  • Largest trunk
    508 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
210hp157kW
178hp133kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
1,613kg3,556lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
2,055kg4,530lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
76.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
41.8s
Calculated
44.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km375mi
Calculated
985km612mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,756mm109in
Front track
1,524mm60in
-
Rear track
1,506mm59in
-
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
508L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAPPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.8 s
44.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 32 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
1,613 kg
3,556 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
215 km/h
134 mph
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
213 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.6 s
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
604 km
375 mi
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
985 km
612 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
8.7 s
213 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.6 s
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
210 hp
157 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.7 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
604 km
375 mi
985 km
612 mi
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 381 km (237 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 89 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 T
2.4 D5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T vs Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP - car comparison - FastVsFaster