Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2011
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    1,515 kg
    3,340 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    909 km
    565 mi
  • Largest trunk
    442 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo ST2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200hp149kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,515kg3,340lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
75.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
29.9s
Calculated
41.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
909km565mi
Calculated
604km375mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
442L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo ST2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.9 s
41.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 10 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI7.6 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.6 s

Although Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has more power, Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
604 km
375 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo ST2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
909 km
565 mi
604 km
375 mi
Trunk score
442 L
15.6 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 305 km (189 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 23 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 T
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster