Car comparison

Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011

2.4 i-VTEC

201 hp2354 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    747 km
    464 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    419 L
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
201hp150kW
210hp157kW
Torque
234Nm173lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,636kg3,607lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight-
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
77.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
75.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
36.5s
Calculated
41.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
747km464mi
Calculated
604km375mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,354cc144cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,750mm187in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,470mm58in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,705mm106in
2,675mm105in
Front track-
1,524mm60in
Rear track-
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
406L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,183L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
58L
CO2 emissions
201g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC7,000 rpm4,300-4,400 rpm7,250 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.5 s
41.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 9 hp more than Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC.

The biggest power difference is between Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
234 Nm
173 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
1,636 kg
3,607 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
222 km/h
138 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC8.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.6 s

Although Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has more power, Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
747 km
464 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
604 km
375 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW
8.3 s
222 km/h
138 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
201 hp
150 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
234 Nm
173 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,636 kg
3,607 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
747 km
464 mi
604 km
375 mi
CO2 score
201 g/km
-
Trunk score
406 L
14.3 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHonda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.22 LC100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.50 LC100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,284 LC/year2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 66 Nm more
  • Is 76 kg lighter
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 13 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Honda Accord VIII 2.4 i-VTEC
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.4 i-VTEC
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.4 i-VTEC
2.4 i-VTEC 16V
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsHondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
2.4 i-VTEC
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 T
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster