Saturn Aura XR
Car comparison
Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6vsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,564cc217cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,851mm191in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,852mm112in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,533mm60in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has 3 hp more than Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 6.2 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
Although Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has more power, Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SaturnAura XR3.6 V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Saturn Aura XR 3.6 V6
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























