Cadillac STS
Car comparison
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8vsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions245 g/km
- Best estimated range569 km353 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 69.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 21.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.2L/100 km12.3mpg US14.7mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 458km285mi Calculated | 569km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,565cc279cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,985mm196in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,464mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,957mm116in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 464L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 343g/km | 245g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 21.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 has 70 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 6.2 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 458 km 285 mi |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 569 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 325 hp 242 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacSTS4.6 i V8 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 458 km 285 mi | 569 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 343 g/km | 245 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8 | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac STS 4.6 i V8
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 98 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























