Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

5.0 V8

470 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Most powerful
    471 hp
    351 kW
  • Highest torque
    603 Nm
    445 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,729 kg
    3,812 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    721 km
    448 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
471hp351kW
470hp350kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
575Nm424lb-ft
Curb weight
1,729kg3,812lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
51.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
721km448mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,673mm184in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,415mm56in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,536mm60in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
295L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
80L
CO2 emissions-
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,000-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
15.5 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
470 hp
350 kW

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
575 Nm
424 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V85.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
721 km
448 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
470 hp
350 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
470 hp
350 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
470 hp
350 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
471 hp
351 kW
470 hp
350 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
575 Nm
424 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
721 km
448 mi
CO2 score
-
264 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 146 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
4.2 V8 32V L Super
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super
V 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
5.0 V8
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
5.0 V8
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S 3.0 V6
5.0 V8
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster