Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T6

306 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    978 km
    608 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
306hp228kW
276hp206kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
55.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
18.2s
Calculated
19.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
978km608mi
Calculated
762km474mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,644mm183in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,427mm56in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,512mm60in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,548mm61in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
381L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
63L
CO2 emissions-
191g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65,700 rpm2,100-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
CadillacATS Sedan2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.2 s
19.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
173 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has 30 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65.9 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.05.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
978 km
608 mi
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
762 km
474 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
306 hp
228 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Range score
978 km
608 mi
762 km
474 mi
CO2 score
-
191 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T6
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
2.0
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 T6
2.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
Veloce 2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 vs Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster