Cadillac ATS Sedan
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 3vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 2vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 1vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Sedan
2.0 (Stage 2)
Cadillac ATS Sedan
2.0 (Stage 1)
Cadillac ATS Sedan
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful414 hp309 kW
- Highest torque547 Nm404 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight283 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions191 g/km
- Best estimated range762 km474 mi
- Largest trunk381 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 414hp309kW+138 hp | 359hp268kW+83 hp | 326hp243kW+50 hp | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 547Nm404lb-ft+194 Nm | 477Nm351lb-ft+124 Nm | 431Nm318lb-ft+78 Nm | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.1s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph-11.7 s Calculated | 48.1s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-7.7 s Calculated | 51.0s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-4.8 s Calculated | 55.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s-6.6 s Calculated | 14.5s-4.6 s Calculated | 16.0s-3.1 s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 373Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km474mi Calculated | 762km474mi Calculated | 762km474mi Calculated | 762km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 381L | 381L | 381L | 381L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L | 63L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 191g/km | 191g/km | 191g/km | 191g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 14.5 s | 16.0 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.0 s | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 414 hp 309 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 326 hp 243 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW |
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp has 138 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp: 138 hp (103 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 547 Nm 404 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 477 Nm 351 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 431 Nm 318 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 4.6 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 5.0 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 5.3 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 762 km 474 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 762 km 474 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 762 km 474 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 762 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 414 hp 309 kW | 4.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW | 5.0 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 414 hp 309 kW | 359 hp 268 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 547 Nm 404 lb-ft | 477 Nm 351 lb-ft | 431 Nm 318 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 474 mi | 762 km 474 mi | 762 km 474 mi | 762 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 191 g/km | 191 g/km | 191 g/km | 191 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























