Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Sedan
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range1,129 km702 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful276 hp206 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,129km702mi Calculated | 762km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,262mm207in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,948mm77in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,171mm125in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,647mm65in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 381L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 191g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW |
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 has 1 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 6.4 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 1,129 km 702 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 762 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,129 km 702 mi | 762 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 191 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
- Has 247 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 367 km (228 mi) more estimated range
- Has 149 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























