Cadillac ATS Sedan
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 3vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 2vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 · Stage 1vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Sedan
2.0 (Stage 2)
Cadillac ATS Sedan
2.0 (Stage 1)
Cadillac ATS Sedan
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful414 hp309 kW
- Highest torque547 Nm404 lb-ft
- Lightest1,542 kg3,400 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range744 km462 mi
- Largest trunk381 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 414hp309kW+138 hp | 359hp268kW+83 hp | 326hp243kW+50 hp | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 547Nm404lb-ft+194 Nm | 477Nm351lb-ft+124 Nm | 431Nm318lb-ft+78 Nm | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,542kg3,400lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.2s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-13.0 s Calculated | 48.2s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-9.0 s Calculated | 50.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.3 s Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s-1.4 s | 5.2s-0.9 s | 5.5s-0.6 s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s-7.0 s Calculated | 15.7s-4.7 s Calculated | 17.4s-3.0 s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s-1.3 s Calculated | 5.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km462mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 381L | 381L | 381L | 381L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L | 63L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 195g/km | 195g/km | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 15.7 s | 17.4 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s | 11.4 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s | 13.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 414 hp 309 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 326 hp 243 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW |
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp has 138 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp: 138 hp (103 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 547 Nm 404 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 477 Nm 351 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 431 Nm 318 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 4.7 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 5.2 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 5.5 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp: 1.4 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 744 km 462 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 744 km 462 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 744 km 462 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 744 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 414 hp 309 kW | 4.7 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW | 5.2 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.5 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 3)414 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 2)359 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 (Stage 1)326 hp | CadillacATS Sedan2.0276 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 414 hp 309 kW | 359 hp 268 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 547 Nm 404 lb-ft | 477 Nm 351 lb-ft | 431 Nm 318 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 462 mi | 744 km 462 mi | 744 km 462 mi | 744 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 195 g/km | 195 g/km | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 1) 326 hp | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 276 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 3) 414 hp
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 (Stage 2) 359 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























