Cadillac ATS Coupe
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)
AMG GLC 63
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range617 km383 mi
- Best overall score76/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed298 km/h185 mph
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 471hp351kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 603Nm445lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,935kg4,266lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated | 62.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t183kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 617km383mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,564cc217cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,691mm185in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 2,096mm83in |
| Height | 1,384mm54in | 1,578mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,873mm113in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,669mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 295L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 has 5 hp more than Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 617 km 383 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 471 hp 351 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 617 km 383 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 47 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 129 km (80 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























