Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)

AMG GLC 63

476 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Most powerful
    476 hp
    355 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    617 km
    383 mi
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    61/100

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Lightest
    1,725 kg
    3,803 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    273 hp/t
    204 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
471hp351kW
476hp355kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,935kg4,266lb
Gross weight-
2,590kg5,710lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
62.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
12.9s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
246hp/t183kW/t112hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,691mm185in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,841mm72in
2,096mm83in
Height
1,384mm54in
1,578mm62in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
2,873mm113in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,684mm66in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,669mm66in
Trunk volume
295L
-
Doors
2
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
66L
CO2 emissions-
244g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 635,500-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.9 s
14.9 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
120 mph
185 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 has 5 hp more than Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
1,935 kg
4,266 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
471 hp
351 kW
476 hp
355 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.0 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
617 km
383 mi
CO2 score
-
244 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 129 km (80 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 - car comparison - FastVsFaster