Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8vsCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Coupe
V 3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful471 hp351 kW
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 453hp338kW | 471hp351kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 603Nm445lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,691mm185in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,384mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 295L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has 18 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 4.4 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 453 hp 338 kW | 471 hp 351 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 | Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Has 14 Nm more
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Has 18 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























