Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8vsCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

4.0 V8

462 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017
VS

Cadillac ATS Coupe

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    304 km/h
    189 mph
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.2 L/100 km
    19.3 mpg US
    23.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    699 km
    434 mi
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
462hp345kW
471hp351kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
603Nm445lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,725kg3,803lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
-
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
64.3s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
11.9s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
488km303mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
3,564cc217cu in
Length
4,546mm179in
4,691mm185in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,288mm51in
1,384mm54in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
98mm4in
-
Trunk volume-
295L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
61L
CO2 emissions
216g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V86,000 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.9 s
13.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
194 km/h
120 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
304 km/h
189 mph
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V84.0 s
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V64.2 s

Although Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
699 km
434 mi
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
4.0 s
304 km/h
189 mph
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
4.0 s
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
462 hp
345 kW
471 hp
351 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.2 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
488 km
303 mi
CO2 score
216 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
4.0 V8
55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
V 3.6 V6
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
4.0 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8
V 3.6 V6
MC 4.7 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
4.0 V8
S 500
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsBMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
4.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
V 3.6 V6
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 vs Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster