Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500vsCadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac Allante
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range633 km394 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 96.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.5s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 534km332mi Calculated | 633km394mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,540mm179in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 76L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: Power / Torque
- Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 5,600 rpm | 2,700-4,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.5 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 299 hp 223 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 has 7 hp more than Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 6.2 s |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 and Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 534 km 332 mi |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 633 km 394 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 299 hp 223 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | CadillacAllante4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 534 km 332 mi | 633 km 394 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 | Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac Allante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 99 km (61 mi) more estimated range
- Has 184 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























