Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0vsBYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F66)

Cooper S 2.0

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2024-present
VS

BYD Seal 06 GT

72.96 kWh

224 hpElectricRWDAutomaticHatchback2024-2026

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    150 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh

  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    595 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
Power
204hp152kW
224hp167kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,940kg4,277lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
79.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
48.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
-
Length
3,876mm153in
4,630mm182in
Width
1,744mm69in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,432mm56in
1,490mm59in
Wheelbase
2,495mm98in
2,820mm111in
Front track-
1,625mm64in
Rear track-
1,630mm64in
Trunk volume
210L
595L
Max trunk volume
725L
1,103L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
48.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
146 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
224 hp
167 kW

BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh has 20 hp more than Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 and BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
1,940 kg
4,277 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
242 km/h
150 mph
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.06.6 s
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh7.5 s

Although BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh has more power, Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 and BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
6.6 s
242 km/h
150 mph
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
224 hp
167 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
210 L
7.4 cu ft
Length
3,876 mm
152.6 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in
BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0BYDSeal 06 GT72.96 kWh
Power
204 hp
152 kW
224 hp
167 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.5 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,940 kg
4,277 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
210 L
7.4 cu ft
Length
3,876 mm
152.6 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in
Trunk score
210 L
7.4 cu ft
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 580 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 385 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0
BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper S 2.0 vs BYD Seal 06 GT 72.96 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster