Buick Envision II
Car comparison
Buick Envision II Plus 652TvsCadillac GT4 25T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac GT4
25T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Largest trunk515 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.7s Calculated | 63.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.7mpg US36.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,845mm191in | 4,633mm182in |
| Width | 1,883mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,695mm67in | 1,536mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,833mm112in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 131mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 515L | 289L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,712L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
- Cadillac GT4 25T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| CadillacGT425T | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | CadillacGT425T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.7 s | 63.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 26 hp more than Cadillac GT4 25T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CadillacGT425T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
| CadillacGT425T | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.4 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and Cadillac GT4 25T: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 889 km 552 mi |
| CadillacGT425T | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacGT425T |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Buick Envision II Plus 652T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | CadillacGT425T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Buick Envision II Plus 652T | Cadillac GT4 25T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.7 mpg US36.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.39 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.55 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,148 L303 US gal252 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,008 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 226 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























